Throughout our firm’s history, FSB has always been known for its exceptionally talented staff. There’s another factor that’s critical to our success, however, namely that most of our firm’s 200+ architects, engineers, planners, interior designers and other key personnel are located under one roof. This deliberate co-location strategy creates unequaled opportunities for staff to streamline communication about a project’s feasibility, constructability and cost. This improved collaboration, in turn, is an essential ingredient to the successful completion of each project, no matter what its size or method of delivery.
“At FSB, our in-house teams enable great communication,” said Gene Brown, President. “Rather than working in silos, our engineers work directly with our architects to provide a cohesive design. Each project is assigned a team, and that team works closely together throughout the life of the project. When one of our experts can literally get up and go ask someone a question, instead of waiting for phone calls and emails to be returned, it has an obvious reduction in lag time.”
In contrast, many AE firms have architects and engineers in different locations who communicate in a sporadic fashion during the design process, so their facility designs aren’t as cohesive. The end result can be buildings that are less energy efficient and more difficult and costly to maintain.
Sometimes clients fear that selecting a large in-house firm means they’ll get “pot luck,” with randomly assigned architects and engineers who may or may not have experience with their particular type of facility. At FSB, this is far from the case, as the firm’s interdisciplinary teams are assigned to specific market sectors. FSB’s market sectors include Aviation, Civic, Commercial, Mission Critical, Native American, Federal and Education. Each market sector team has extensive, ongoing and often award-winning design experience in that particular sector. By working in specialized teams on multiple projects, these professionals have developed excellent communication and overall understanding of each member’s role in specific types of projects. This leads to increased performance.
These benefits continue to hold true no matter what project delivery method is selected. During the design process in-house teams also have access to a common CAD database, which is seen by all disciplines in real time and allows errors to be caught and changes made early in the process. This makes a huge difference in FSB’s ability to identify any design issues as quickly as possible and to provide coordinated, thorough and up-to-date construction drawings. The result is major time and money savings for the client and a smoother construction process.
“This simultaneous collaboration also benefits the client long after the facility is completed,” Brown said. “For example, if the support systems of a building are designed in from the beginning, rather than added as an afterthought, it results in building systems that function more economically and are much easier to maintain throughout the life of the facility.”
Finally, having a large pool of professional staff under one roof makes an enormous difference when it comes to quality control. At FSB, each design undergoes an extensive peer review process conducted by an interdisciplinary team of architects and engineers who are not assigned to that project. This process is hugely simplified when a reviewer can literally walk across an office aisle to get questions answered or consult with other personnel.
Buildings are much more complex than they used to be. By working together in house, FSB can ensure the architects and engineers collaborate from the very beginning and avoid a lot of unnecessary expense, delays and frustration for clients.
To learn more about the benefits of FSB’s in-house services, contact Laure Majors at email@example.com or 405-840-2931.